Will the Real Estate Investor Please Stand Up?

As an investor (or even homeowner) buying an existing home, you have to be very aware of when your home or investment property was built. This is because homes that were built before 1980 are likely to have asbestos insulation. This is important to know because when you are remodeling / rehabbing your investment property / home, you may expose yourself to asbestos. Asbestos can lead to the deadly cancer called mesothelioma. What’s so deadly about it is that it’s difficult to diagnose, and by the time that it’s diagnosed, it has usually reached a late stage. Investors and homeowners doing remodels / rehabs should educate themselves on the subject, and I wanted to dedicate this blogpost to this issue. The following resource on asbestos removal and environmentally safe insulation options was sent to me by Jesse Herman from Mesothelioma Cancer Center.

“There are many things to consider when remodeling or purchasing an older home. Homes built before 1980 have the strong likelihood of containing asbestos. Due to a steady progression of technology and green sustainable methods, there are many ways to ensure your home or property is asbestos free. If you are interested in saving money, remodeling and improving your carbon footprint, here is some information to get you on the right track.

Used in millions of homes throughout the last quarter of the 20^th century, asbestos insulation can become a real dilemma for homeowners due to causing a variety of health problems, including Peritoneal Mesothelioma and Malignant Mesothelioma. These types of cancer take the lives of thousands each year.

Non-regulated asbestos material can be legally performed by homeowners, regular contractors, or licensed asbestos abatement contractors as long as the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) are not violated. Asbestos removal in public facilities, homes and workplaces must be undertaken by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor. Once the removal is complete, green insulation options should be given serious consideration, such as: Cellulose, Cotton Fiber and Lcynene.

The United States Green Building Council (USGBC), in a study conducted in 2003, estimated a savings of $50-$65 per square foot for well-constructed green buildings in the U.S. (see table below) during that year. The numbers continue to improve as more eco-friendly options become available, and those kinds of figures have finally begun to attract those who thought eco-friendly construction was just a bunch of hogwash.”

“

There has been quite a bit written in the blogosphere about the “bailout” of our crumbling financial system. I don’t much feel like rehashing what’s been written, but I would like to state my opinion and cite some of my favorite blogposts on the topic, as I have had some time to ponder the issues. And finally, I would like to explore how this affects the real estate market and real estate investing.

First off, when I first heard about the proposed “bailout”, my gut reaction was that a bailout of any sort goes against the notions of free markets and capitalism. You mess up, you pay the price. You do well, you get rewarded. Isn’t that why immigrants come to this country? It sure is why my parents and I came here when I was 14: the opportunity to make something of yourself and your life, regardless of your connections to the KGB. What kind of message are we sending to corporations and other entities? It’s OK to fail. Your job is safe, the taxpayer will bail you out. Corporate greed is OK too.

Then I thought about it, and perhaps some kind of action plan is necessary (well, it was necessary a while ago, but our leaders were too busy telling us that the fundamentals are strong). What we need is not a bailout. Something different. Not sure what, yet. If the financial markets keep spiraling down into this vortex, the impact on the country’s economic health could be catastrophic. But how catastrophic? Would it be more damaging than the $700 billion + bailout is to the taxpayer’s wallet? It’s hard to say. But what if this bailout still doesn’t solve the problem? That’s entirely possible too. To ensure that it works, there needs to be a stronger plan of action vs. a fuzzy “blank check” approach. I find Robert Reich’s blogpost the most illuminating writing on the topic in terms of a strong action plan and concrete rules and oversights to be put in place.

Finally, Paulson’s connections to the Street make the whole thing appear just a bit too fishy for my taste. And the Section 8 is just the last straw. It reads exactly like this:

Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency.

Did that make anyone else’s hairs on the back of the neck stand up? Eeeekkk! We are headed towards something very very bad in this country. We are allowing an ex-Goldman guy to have unilateral control (without being reviewed by a court of law!!) to make decisions on the Wall St. bailout. That would make it very easy to cover stuff up, wouldn’t it? Hmmm…. And no one can investigate…

When did it become OK for the American public to give up all control of their lives and decision making to folks who supposedly should be acting in the interests of the public, but have way too much conflict of interest to actually do so? How did we allow ourselves to be scared into Patriot Act and the Iraq war? And now we are being scared into passing this piece of steaming shiitake? Are we still a democracy? Sure doesn’t feel like it. Feels like we are headed towards a dictatorship, a military state. I am exceedingly concerned for this country and the ease with which the American Dream and Democracy are being annihilated in front of our very own eyes. Our founding fathers must be rolling over in their graves.

So… I must somehow bring this back to real estate and real estate investing. How does this affect real estate investing? Well, in the same way as this whole mess has been affecting real estate for the past year or so (this mess started in real estate, if you remember). It is close to impossible to get a mortgage for an investor (and now, as of Dec 1, Fannie won’t allow to finance more than 4 properties per person, including primary residence). So forget about conventional channels. If you want to take advantage of good deals, you must learn and implement creative real estate investing (seller financing, subject-to, private lending, etc.)

Everyone is cautious, however; homeowners and investors are waiting for the market to hit bottom before moving. And now that the sky is falling, and we seem to be writing a blank check signed by the American Taxpayer, Joe Investor who is hoping to work the foreclosure market and get some cashflow properties is a bit more afraid of his future and is a bit more hesitant to act. Investing for cashflow, if you follow creative real estate strategies, remains a viable strategy. As far as other exit strategies, it’s a bit more dicey…  Jim Homeowner to whom Joe Investor hopes to sell his rehab is also more hesitant; he is more concerned about keeping his job than straddling himself with a new liability in the form of a new house. And now that Jim Homeowner is funding a bailout of epic proportions, well, there goes his saved up 20%+ downpayment that he now needs to buy a house.

Related articles by Zemanta

• Marshall Grossman: Hey Congress, Tell Mr. Paulson: No Public Investment without Public Equity
• Bush-Pelosi bailout plan
• Cliff Asness on the Current Crisis
• Off Topic: Fallout from the Bailout
• Dealbreaker Editor: “Wall Street Is Broken”

HomeVestors (the “We Buy Ugly Houses” folks) has named the top 10 cities for real estate investing and 10 junior markets for real estate investing in the first quarter of 2008 (Junior markets are cities with a population of 150,000 or more). They are as follows:

1. Dallas, TX
2. Houston, TX
3. Atlanta, Ga
4. Fort Worth, TX
5. St. Louis, MO
6. Philadelphia, PA
7. San Antonio, TX
8. Denver, CO
9. Minneapolis, MN
10. Phoenix, AZ

Top 10 Junior Markets

1. Columbus, GA
2. Panama City, FL
3. Springfield, MO
4. Brevard County, FL
5. Greensboro, NC
6. Lubbock, TX
7. Columbia, SC
8. Ft. Walton Beach, FL
9. Kent/Sussex Counties, DE
10. Michigan City, IN

These findings are based on the number of houses bought in each market by HomeVestors in Q1 of quarter of 2008 (source http://www.homevestors.com/inthenews)

As the Dallas-based franchise company specializes in buying, rehabbing and selling single-family houses and rescuing homeowners from ugly houses and ugly real estate situations, the current downturn in residential real estate makes for a fantastic acquisition environment. As I mentioned in a previous blogpost, this climate of falling prices, inventory oversupply, and resulting homeowner desperation to get rid of their houses, is a prime time for smart investors to go heavy on property acquisition. As long as your exit strategy is to buy and hold, and not to flip (which is going to be very very difficult in today’s climate), and as long as you can afford to hold the property for at least 5-7 years, you should definitely take advantage of these conditions.

I have to admit that I don’t completely trust this data. I mean, I do not doubt that these are the areas where some of the best bargains can be had: HomeVestors does enough volume to observe significant trends. But there are so many other factors that make a city a hot investment market, which can not be ignored; the HomeVestors press release doesn’t address those factors explicitly. For example, the city’s economic development plans, jobs growth outlook, and other macroeconomic factors must be considered. Also, the rental outlook must be considered. As you buy a property, the low acquisition price is only one factor that determines whether you will see positive cash flow (or at least break even). Rents must also be strong and in demand. Overall, there is strong rental demand right now across the nation, as many homeowners lose their homes to foreclosure and many other hopeful homeowners can’t get a mortgage due to tougher standards. But some cities are definitely hotter rental markets than others. If people are fleeting a city due to lack of jobs, rental market will suffer. The HomeVestor list seems to be very TX-centric. By a sheer coincidence, the company is based in Dallas. Hmmm….. I would be very interested in hearing from our readers what they consider to be the top cities for investing.

Another question for the readers: would you consider investing away from home? What are some factors that you consider whether or not you feel comfortable with investing away from home? What resources do you use? Do you work with another local investor to show you the ropes? We are working on a tool that can connect investors to each other, based on area of interest, as well as other investing goals. As various areas of the country may become attractive to investors than their own home turf (Gulf Region GO Zone, for example), we see more and more people venturing outside of their own backyard. And we would love to help investors make the process a smooth one.

Is it the beginning of the end for the U.S. real estate downturn? Mark Zandi, Chief Economist from Moody’s Economy.com certainly seems to think so (CNN interview aired earlier this week). This discussion comes on the heels of the NAR report stating that existing home sales have actually improved from January to February 2008, but the median price is more than 8% down vs. last year. Methinks that inflection point is happening right now, because prices are finally low enough for people to get back into the market.

Zandi points to this latest increase in sales as the point where homes are starting to stabilize, putting us at the beginning of the end of the downturn, a process he still predicts to be very long. Home sellers are now “capitulating”, lowering listing prices to be in line with the market, and making the deals more attractive for the buyers. Additionally, the mortgage rates are low enough to stimulate homebuying activity. Finally, after decades of home prices outpacing salary growth, homeowners can somewhat afford to get back into the game. According to Zandi, “prices have been declining for two years. I think we’ll see another year worth of declines. We are down 10 to 13 percent from their peak. I think they’ll decline another 5 to 10 percent between now and the spring ‘09 selling season. So it’s not over. We’ve got a ways to go. ”

So here you go. There is one good year left of rock-bottom housing prices, after which they should continue to climb back up. We as investors haven’t had an opportunity like this in several decades, to get into a property at a price low enough to produce positive cash flow. This is an opportunity not to be missed. I would like to re-emphasize from my recent blog post, that this real estate environment is a perfect time to acquire a property that you hold for the long term and rent out, and not designed for a short-term flip.

In one of my recent blogposts I discussed the effect of Wall Street’s troubles on demand of rentals as well as for-sale properties. Per this Fox News report, rents for 1- and 2-bedroom apartments have already started dropping in Manhattan, while price of studios went up. This, I believe, points to lessened demand for larger, more expensive housing units, and an increased demand for smaller, less expensive units. As I discussed in my previous post, many Wall Streeters and other NYC employees may be opting to reduce their lifestyle in the light of general economic malaise / recession, and very possible layoffs.

So if 1-bedroom units decrease in price, and studios increase in price, they just may become equal in price over time. At which point, renters will move back into 1-bedroom apartments. To all my renters, I say, get a short term lease for a 1-bedroom (if, in fact, there are deals out there), and go back out hunting for even better deals in 3-6 months. If they started to drop, I think they will continue to do so. And then, once you believe the rental market is at the bottom (largely depending on how this recession scenario plays out), lock yourself into a nice permanent low-priced lease (well, low-priced in Manhattan terms, that is).

To all my landlords, current and aspiring… Rack up on low-priced properties over the next year. There are a ton of foreclosures. There are also a ton of non-foreclosures that have been on the market for quite some time (I think the average is 11 months nationally and 2 months in Manhattan, but don’t quote me on that). So if you are buying on the island, I would wait until Manhattaners become more desperate to sell, as they are everywhere else. Even though rents may be decreasing in Manhattan, they will surely go back up: the cultural, intellectual and financial appeal of the Big Apple is hard to beat). Nationally, rents are up quite a bit, driven by increased demand (because people still have to live somewhere after they lose their homes, and foreclosures are only going up). So now being a landlord makes more sense than ever: buy cheap, hold for a while, realize appreciation and rent out for cash in your pocket monthly. Perhaps we will see a similar trend towards smaller and cheaper apartments nationally. So picking up some of those would be good now. But also don’t forget that you are buying for the long term, and rents will keep increasing over the years, while your mortgage will stay the same. Which means… cash flow!! A good and diversified assortment of properties will keep you well-covered, should demand swing towards smaller units, back to larger units, and whichever way it chooses to go.

Happy renting and landlording!

As so many homeowners are losing their homes to foreclosure, and the real estate market is at the forefront of our economy and politics, investors like us are trying to understand how our worlds are affected.

Because real estate prices have plummeted, quick flips and investing for capital gains are no longer no-brainers of yesteryear. This is due to a confluence of several factors, such as: 1) an oversupply of inventory driving down prices (with new foreclosures predicted to keep flooding the market), 2) tighter lending standards reducing the pool of buyers and 3) general market malaise and impending recession making just about everyone apprehensive about real estate .

Again, the savvy real estate investors know that during difficult times is when wealth is created. Real estate will always be a great investment mechanism, but it’s the exit strategies that will have to change. Hence, investors with experience are focusing their attention on longer term rental investments. Because of plummeting prices, many investors will see positive cash flow from their properties.

As such, it is more important than ever before for real estate investors to understand the relationship between homeownership and rents. I stumbled upon this blogpost from the Curious Cat blog, which I found very interesting and wanted to share. It summarizes the following research paper which focuses on the relationship between rents and home prices between 1960 and 2006. The article focuses on the rent-price ratio as part of real estate returns calculation (the higher the ratio, the more expensive the rents are vs. home ownership). The rent-to-own ratio is basically the “dividend yield”, which must be considered in addition to the capital gains, when calculating the return on the real estate asset. This article is an interesting “rough guide” to the rent-to-own relationship. As the capital appreciation on real estate had increased more rapidly than rents between 1995 and 2006 (the housing bubble), this second part of the “ROI equation” had decreased, which is important to consider. With rents on the rise and housing prices falling, the ratio is likely to get realigned with its historical average.